Family is a major driver of migration. Family migration is the term used to categorize the migration of people who migrate due to new or established family ties, and it encompasses several sub-categories: reunification with a family member who migrated earlier (a person with subsidiary protection is also entitled to (re)unite with family members); family accompanying a principal migrant; marriage between an immigrant and a citizen; marriage between an immigrant and a foreigner living abroad; and international adoptions.
In general, data on family migration are sparse and family (re)unification programmes are the predominant means to collect such data. These programmes were developed to ensure the right to a family enshrined in Article 16 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Data on family migration are based on visas and residence permits issued to family members, as well as population registers.
Back to top
Family migration as a general concept covers family reunification, family formation, accompanying family members of workers, and international adoption. The following are key terms and concepts:
Family reunification/reunion is “the right of non-nationals to enter into and reside in a country where their family members reside lawfully or of which they have the nationality in order to preserve the family unit” (IOM, 2019).
Family formation refers to the situation in which “a resident, national or foreigner, marries a foreigner and sponsors that individual for admission or for status change” (OECD, 2017).
Accompanying family “means family members [who] are admitted together with the principal migrant” (OECD, 2017).
International adoption is where a “resident, national or foreigner, adopts a child of foreign nationality resident abroad” (OECD, 2017).
Dependent is “in the migration context, any person who is granted entry into a State for the purpose of family reunification on the basis of being supported by a “sponsor” with whom the individual has a proven family relationship" (IOM, 2019).
Members of the family are “persons married to a migrant or a national, or having with them a relationship that, according to applicable law, produces effects equivalent to marriage, as well as their dependent children or other dependent persons who are recognized as members of the family by applicable legislation or applicable bilateral or multilateral agreements between the States concerned, including when they are not nationals of the State” (IOM, 2019).
The scope of family reunification depends on national law. For example, some countries may include same-sex partners (registered or married) or unmarried partners, whereas others may not (European Migration Network, 2017). Thus, the definition of whom family members can comprise varies across countries.
Transnational families “are families who live apart, but who create and retain a ‘sense of collective welfare and unity, in short “familyhood”, even across national borders’” (Bryceson and Vuorela, 2002 in ACP, 2012).
Data on family migration in developing countries are either sparse or scattered, due to a lack of capacity or political will to collect data (see Data strengths and limitations below). However, family migration data are available for countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) area. During the first half of 2020, migration inflows to most OECD countries decreased due to restrictions imposed to contain the spread of COVID-19; however, they did not come to a complete halt. Inflows of non-nationals continued as a result of migrants who were allowed entry based on prevailing exceptions – among those, migrants travelling for family reasons. For example, among other exceptional categories, Ireland processed the visa applications of migrants who were immediate family members of Irish nationals (OECD, 2020).
Among OECD countries, family migration (including accompanying family of migrants) comprised 41 per cent -- around 1.9 million migrants -- of the total permanent migration flows in 2018 (OECD, 2020). Family migration slightly increased from 40 per cent in 2017 to 41 per cent in 2018 in relative terms, but it slightly decreased in absolute terms, more specifically from nearly 2 million in 2017 to 1.9 million in 2018. The number of family members accompanying migrant workers comprised 262,300 in 2018 (ibid).
The United States accounted for 40 per cent (768,300) of total family migration to OECD countries in 2018, which represents a 3 percentage points drop in comparison to 2017 (OECD, 2020). In 2018, the flow of family migration increased in such OECD countries as the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Japan and the Netherlands. A strong fall in migration for family reasons was observed in New Zealand, besides in the United States (ibid.).
From 2014 until 2018, family migration increased in the majority of countries in the OECD area (OECD, 2017; 2020). However, in some OECD countries, family migration flows declined due to the shrinking of family reunification programmes (OECD, 2019). Nonetheless, no country has established outright restrictions on family migration, although there have been recent deliberations in the United States regarding the possible ending of family-based migration (MPI, 2017).
Despite the existing legal instruments and programmes that ensure the right to a family life, in 2012, the proportion of non-EU nationals in the European Union not living with their spouses or partners reached 5-7 per cent of those who live together, a much higher level of "living apart together" than for EU nationals (MIPEX, 2014). While family reunification policies have remained mostly the same in the majority of countries covered by MIPEX since 2015, seven countries have increased restrictions (MIPEX, 2020).
Both flow and stock data on family migration are predominantly based on national administrative records. Family migration flow data are derived from entry clearance visas (ECV), first residence permits or population registers for family reasons. Stock data on family migration are based on stock of permits or stock of long-term residents. Some countries combine administrative and specific survey data on family migration, e.g. the international passenger survey (IPS), to augment the quality of data. Data on family migration are also collected via such sample surveys as annual population surveys, labour force surveys or income and living conditions surveys. Data collected via individual surveys or ethnographic studies enable collection of granular data to better understand the transnational family arrangements across borders.
The following are databases that consolidate flow or stock data on family migration:
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) consolidates inflow data on family, work and humanitarian migration. The OECD dataset on permanent immigrant inflows is derived from Eurostat (see below) and non-EU countries. The dataset is updated on a biannual basis.
OECD also produces statistics on permanent migration inflows in the OECD area, based on the aforementioned dataset, which are presented in the OECD’s International Migration Outlook. The report also presents estimates on family migration for OECD countries and is updated annually.
Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Union compiles data on asylum and managed migration primarily based on administrative sources provided by EU Member States’ national statistical offices, interior ministries or related immigration agencies, as well as by Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The database on asylum and managed migration presents the following datasets:
- First permits issued for family reunification with a beneficiary of protection status
- First permits issued for family reasons, by reason, length of validity and citizenship
- Change of immigration status permits, by reason and citizenship
- Admitted family members of EU Blue Card holders, by type of decision and citizenship
- EU Blue Card holders and family members, by member state of previous residence
- Permits valid at the end of the year for family reunification with a beneficiary of protection status
The aforementioned datasets are disaggregated by sex and age. Data are predominantly updated on an annual basis.
The Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) measures migrant integration policies, including those who come for family reasons. There are currently 8 policy indicators that measure policies. In 2011/2, MIPEX conducted a survey to measure how easily immigrants can reunite with their family members. Data on family reunion are available for Australia, Canada, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Switzerland, the USA, the EU Member States and Turkey. Data on family reunion for 2011/2 were last updated in 2014.Back to top
Data strengths & limitations
In light of the current political climate, in which family-based migration in some countries is discussed in connection to irregular migration or in the context of it being a burden to the social system of a host country, granular data on family migration are of special importance to deconstruct these particular myths with data-driven deliberations.
The existing data sources on family migration are valuable baselines, but further enhancement in data collection and harmonization methodologies is essential. In pursuit of these improvements there are limitations that hinder the process, including the following:
There is no global comparable database on family migration, which covers all countries and areas of the world. This is due to a lack of data from most developing countries. Data are missing due to a lack of capacity to collect, process and disseminate data on family migration in these countries. Even when data are available, it is often challenging to integrate and harmonize datasets of diverse origins because of inconsistent methodological frameworks.
There is still little known about the recent dynamics of family migration and about the impact of migration policies in shaping it (OECD, 2017). This is despite the availability of family migration data in some regions of the world. Moreover, the evidence-base regarding the socio-economic demographic characteristics of family migration in some countries has not been updated. For example, in the United States, the most recent surveys on socio-demographic characteristics of family migrants date from the 2000s (ibid.).
Statistics derived from administrative records do not portray the complete picture of the flow of family migrants (GMG 2017). This is because, although administrative data sources enable the production of estimates on family migration, statistics derived from population registers and issuance of residence permits refer to administrative records rather than people (ibid.). For example, if the permit granted to the head of a family covers her or his dependents, the number of issued residence permits over a year will not be equivalent to the number of family migrants. Some countries are undertaking initiatives to tackle this issue. They tend to combine different data types, namely survey data and administrative records, to improve the quality of migration data.
Data on transnational familyhood are scarce. Despite the growing importance of this type of family arrangement in recent years, there is still limited knowledge on the scale and dynamics of this type of family arrangement in a migration context. Evidence-based policy is needed to ensure the migration of a family member does not need to lead to those left behind suffering.
Data on family emigration are currently incomplete because of the most countries’ limited capacity or lack of political will to collect data on family emigration. Thus, policy makers lack a sufficient evidence base to facilitate family emigration processes.
|Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)|
|2017||Making Integration Work: Family Migrants, OECD, Paris.|
|2019||International Migration Outlook, OECD, Paris.|
|International Organization for Migration (IOM)|
|2019||World Migration Report 2020, IOM, Geneva.|
|Castro Martin, T., J. Koops, and D. Vono de Vilhena (eds.)|
|2019||Migrant Families in Europe: Evidence from the Generations & Gender Programme. Discussion Paper No. 11, Berlin: Population Europe.|
|2017||Overview of Family-Based Immigration and the Effects of Limiting Chain Migration, Niskanen Center, Washington, D.C.|
|Fan, C. and M. Sun and S. Zheng|
|2011||Migration and split households: A comparison of sole, couple, and family migrants in Beijing, China, Environment and Planning A, 43: 2164-2185.|
|European Migration Network (EMN)|
|2017||Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationals in the EU plus Norway: National Practices, EMN, Dublin.|
|Confederation of Family Organizations in the European Community (COFACE)|
|2012||Transnational Families and the Impact of Economic Migration on Families, COFACE, Brussels.|
Back to top